CBS News apologizes for misleading Benghazi story; book publisher yanks book at center of controversy

BenghaziSimon & Schuster imprint Threshold Editions is yanking the book at the center of the CBS News/’60 Minutes’ Benghazi scandal, after CBS apologized for publishing falsehoods.

It’s good to finally see some accountability in the media for misleading the public about important issues, but this isn’t enough. The real scandal involving Benghazi has been the circus that Republicans have put on in the House of Representatives wasting time on frivolous investigative hearings. More money and time has been spent by the GOP trying put more of the blame for the attacks on the Obama administration than the terrorists who committed it.

Read More →

’60 Minutes’ Benghazi report completely implodes

Dylan DaviesCBS News issued a statement a little over an hour ago announcing that they were reviewing their “60 Minutes” report on the attack against the United States Special Mission in Benghazi last year.

The statement ran just 52 words:

60 Minutes has learned of new information that undercuts the account told to us by Morgan Jones of his actions on the night of the attack on the Benghazi compound.

We are currently looking into this serious matter to determine if he misled us, and if so, we will make a correction.

CBS News is in panic mode right now. All video and clips from the special have been pulled offline.

Read More →

Rand Paul’s big problem

Rand PaulAnother day and another example of Rand Paul stealing work from other people for profit. Doing it in political speeches and even newspaper op-eds is one thing, that’s the plagiarism part. But doing it in a for-profit book changes the offense to copyright infringement and demonstrates a clear lack of respect for the intellectual property rights of other people.

It puts to rest any notion that Rand Paul can be taken seriously when repeating the cute little stories that Republicans love to tell during campaigns about how people should pull themselves up by their own bootstraps and be self-reliant instead of relying on government to help them.

Remember how Mitt Romney’s solution for young adults who can’t afford to go to college is to magically have a brand new set of rich parents to pay for it on their behalf? I guess Rand Paul’s version of that is if you can’t be troubled to do research of your own, just take it.

Read More →

When getting kicked in the balls counts as a win

Ken CuccinelliWho does this remind you of?

Republican Governors Association executive director Phil Cox, whose group has spent nearly $8 million boosting Cuccinelli, firmly rejected the idea that the Virginia race reflected any limitations of conservative ideas. But he allowed that there may be lessons to learn about how you go about delivering a conservative message.

Cox sounds like nearly every Republican in America I heard speak the day after the 2012 election. What people like Cox don’t understand is that there’s a difference between accepting the limits of ideology, and surrendering on everything you believe in and completely caving to the opposition.

Read More →

Poll details continue to show most Americans support Obamacare

Detailed non-entertainment polls continue to show the same results as they have every year since 2010, that most Americans actually support the Affordable Care Act if you dig down further than simplistic support/oppose questions.

If you only ask the topline question, you’ll keep finding the same thing: most people “oppose” the ACA. But if you ask what people want done with it, most want it either left alone (25%), or expanded (22%). The repeal and replace (13%) crowd is small, probably because the Republican Party hasn’t said what they would replace the ACA with. Only 24% want it repealed with no replacement.

Even 18% of Republicans want Obamacare left alone or expanded, more than the 11% of Democrats that want it repealed and/or replaced (the latter with single payer, which could easily fall under “expand”).

Add it up: 47% want the law left alone or expanded, 37% want it gone and/or replaced. Obamacare is not a train wreck or a disaster and it’s a law that most Americans favor.

There’s lots to be said about what’s going on, what we should take away from all of this, and then what should be done about it. Republicans are hammering the exchange roll out failure but they’re essentially shooting at themselves.

Read More →

GOP fiscal policy is the real disaster

CPBB deficit driversBush administration policies and the Lesser Depression account for virtually all of recent, current, and future deficits.

The media’s need to treat every story as an epic disaster to boost ratings and corporate profits is a two-fold failure. It hides the true scale and damage of real disasters by mixing them with minor problems the same way that Wall Street hid the danger of sub-prime mortgages by bundling them with good ones, and it overstates the impact of small problems even when those problems are predictable and can be fixed relatively easily.

The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare or ACA) is not a disaster. Anyone who pays attention to the private sector knows how common ineptitude is. Lehman Brothers and Bear Stern didn’t implode because of the government, they failed because the supposed best minds in finance calculated risk poorly, or were people who worked their way into positions of great power when they didn’t even care. Worldcom didn’t go under because of harsh telecommunication regulations, or Enron because of oppressive energy regulations. Instead, they both perpetrated great accounting frauds and market manipulation after significant deregulation allowed them to operate in the dark.

Asking a dozen or more private companies to create interconnected Internet-scale websites was unreasonable and begging for failure from the very beginning.

Read More →

Fox News gets into the propaganda business

Sean Hannity.Eric Stern knows a lot about the Affordable Care Act and couldn’t believe what he heard from callers complaining about it on Sean Hannity’s show last Friday, so he tracked them down and interviewed them for a story on his Salon column that went live today.

I expected some shenanigans, given how biased Fox News is. This is the network that acted as the official PR wing of the Tea Party in 2010, with Hannity himself speaking at events as an advocate and member.

What I didn’t expect was to find the country’s most watched “news” channel perpetrating a fraud on the American people.

Read More →

What’s in the deal that ends the shutdown tonight

John BoehnerI’m going to sort of synthesize the news I’m catching up on this afternoon. Here are the big points:

1. The House will vote on the Reid-McConnell deal at 11pm, and the Senate will take it up after. Nobody will say it, but we’ll definitely be in default by the time President Obama signs the deal, if you stick to the Obama administration timeline.

Read More →

GOP source: It’s over, Boehner will give in tomorrow (15th)

Robert Costa is the most GOP-wired reporter on the hill. There’s no point in giving examples, just accept what I’m saying and then listen to what he’s reporting tonight:

7:40p Member texts from Cap Hill Club basement, tells me the whole R scene is “depressing… everyone needs a drink after today”

7:45p “Boss heard Boehner will bring [Senate deal] to the floor… House action probably over.” –House GOP aide, via e-mail.

7:51p per sources, options for the House GOP are limited: accept what Reid-McConnell broker, or at last minute try for a short DL ext

I think it was always going to end this way. The House isn’t like the Senate, the Speaker can bring anything he wants to the floor for a vote and nobody can stop it. If John Boehner had brought the clean Senate CR to the floor on Sept 30, it would have passed with more than 300 votes — all Democrats and some Republicans voting for it and no government shut down.

That appears to be what’s going to happen tomorrow.

Read More →

Fiscal conservatism, fiscal sham.

Lots of things to say, but too late in the day to edit and post any of it.

There’s a great post here that I haven’t dug into yet that graphs mentions of terms like “balanced budget” from National Review Online over the past three administrations. I disagree that it’s a good measurement about what Republicans care about, especially since NRO is a policy-driven pundit site and not representative of what members of Congress are thinking, much less conservative voters.

But it’s still hilarious. At the very least, NRO writers don’t give a shit about balanced budgets or cutting spending when a Republican is in the White House, but can’t shut up about either when a Democrat is in office. It doesn’t seem to matter who controls Congress, either. Just the White House. Which says a lot about how fake these fiscal debates always are since Congress writes the budget.

Read More →